Peer Review Process

1. Initial Screening:
   - Each submitted manuscript undergoes an initial review by the editorial team.
   - The aim is to assess the manuscript's suitability with the journal's scope and standards.

2. Expert Reviewers:
   - Manuscripts meeting basic criteria are assigned to reviewers with relevant expertise in the field.
   - Reviewers are experts in the scientific field related to the manuscript's topic.

3. Double-blind Process:
   - The review process is conducted in a double-blind manner, meaning the identities of both reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other.
   - This ensures objective and unbiased evaluations.

4. Criteria for Evaluation:
   - Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on academic merit, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field.
   - They provide constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.

5. Decision Making:
   - After receiving comments from reviewers, the editorial team makes a decision regarding the manuscript's fate.
   - Decisions may include acceptance, revision, or rejection of the manuscript.

6. Author Notification:
   - Authors are notified of the decision along with reviewers' comments.
   - They are given the opportunity to revise their manuscript based on received feedback.

7. Revision and Final Decision:
   - Revised manuscripts may undergo further review before a final decision is made.
   - Once revisions are completed, the final decision is made by the editorial team.

8. Integrity and Ethics:
   - The peer review process aims to uphold the highest standards of academic integrity and publication ethics.
   - This involves transparency, honesty, and thoroughness in assessing the quality and originality of manuscripts.